| 12 Feb 2007 11:34 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44  Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,053 OFFLINE | | |
|
| 13 Feb 2007 02:34 am |
M v C Graphics Designer Rep: 14  Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 8,080 OFFLINE | ya no sony had plans of upgrading the ps3 cell chip from a 96 nano metre or something to a 64 nanometre for less power consumption and better performance, it dont make it obsolete cus that cell of intel was just to see what is posible but things like that culd be slow making in production,
this confirms the ps3 cell is not obsolete its still the best on the market from what i know of ---
 | |
| 13 Feb 2007 08:35 am |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44  Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,053 OFFLINE | dude a freakin 3 core CPU is better than that crap | |
| 13 Feb 2007 04:11 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 23  Joined: 26 Aug 2005 Posts: 4,969 OFFLINE | Di5turbed wrote:
dude a freakin 3 core CPU is better than that crap
Can you prove it? Do you have testing data for this, and have you also programmed for both at their full potential?
80 cores though...Wow...That’s crazy, but in 5 years? I dunno, sounds unbelievable. 80 cores is a lot, but its pure, raw power they’re talking about. Is it cheap to manufacture, what about bus bandwidth? Is the architecture stable, or what? Man, I’d love to see how this turns out... ---

Haruhi demands you join the MvC Otakus | |
| 13 Feb 2007 04:32 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 8  Joined: 23 Jun 2006 Posts: 4,066 OFFLINE | Di5turbed wrote:
dude a freakin 3 core CPU is better than that crap
then i have a kickass processor, because last i checked, i have a 2 core intel processor or something like that. ---
 | |
| 13 Feb 2007 05:07 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 45  Joined: 01 Jul 2006 Posts: 4,149 OFFLINE | Mariomaniac wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
dude a freakin 3 core CPU is better than that crap
then i have a kickass processor, because last i checked, i have a 2 core intel processor or something like that.
i thougt u left ---
PS3KICKS360 wrote:
I am a celebrity for all those gay porno’s I do in my spare time 
| |
| 13 Feb 2007 05:32 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44  Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,053 OFFLINE | RageOverdose wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
dude a freakin 3 core CPU is better than that crap
Can you prove it? Do you have testing data for this, and have you also programmed for both at their full potential?
80 cores though...Wow...That’s crazy, but in 5 years? I dunno, sounds unbelievable. 80 cores is a lot, but its pure, raw power they’re talking about. Is it cheap to manufacture, what about bus bandwidth? Is the architecture stable, or what? Man, I’d love to see how this turns out...
Actually HAVOk does they said the Cell calculates physics as good as a 3core CPU | |
| 13 Feb 2007 05:51 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 23  Joined: 26 Aug 2005 Posts: 4,969 OFFLINE | Di5turbed wrote:
RageOverdose wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
dude a freakin 3 core CPU is better than that crap
Can you prove it? Do you have testing data for this, and have you also programmed for both at their full potential?
80 cores though...Wow...That’s crazy, but in 5 years? I dunno, sounds unbelievable. 80 cores is a lot, but its pure, raw power they’re talking about. Is it cheap to manufacture, what about bus bandwidth? Is the architecture stable, or what? Man, I’d love to see how this turns out...
Actually HAVOk does they said the Cell calculates physics as good as a 3core CPU
You didn’t prove your point, and actually aided mine. ---

Haruhi demands you join the MvC Otakus | |
| 13 Feb 2007 05:56 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44  Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,053 OFFLINE | ALMOST AS GOOD | |
|
|
Post Reply |